Built to the official exam specification: 180 items each, three answer choices, two timed 135-minute sessions, topic mix inside the published 2026 weight ranges. The clock runs, the paper submits itself when time is up, and nothing is revealed until you finish — then you get a scored breakdown and a worked explanation for every question.
Broad first-pass coverage of all ten topics. Sit this one cold, under full conditions, before you look at anything else.
Sit this paper → Paper 2Entirely different items, leaning harder on application and calculation. Save it for two or three weeks after the first.
Sit this paper →Source: CFA Institute Level I candidate resources. The 2026 curriculum is unchanged from 2025 — same 93 learning modules, same 365 learning outcome statements, same topic weights.
| Score | Band | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 75%+ | Comfortable | Clear of any plausible passing line. Maintain, and protect the weak topics from decaying. |
| 70–74% | Likely pass | On track. Keep sitting timed papers so exam-day pace does not eat the margin. |
| 63–69% | Borderline | Could go either way. This is where fixing one heavy weak topic changes the outcome. |
| 55–62% | Below the line | Content gaps, not exam technique. Go back to the material before sitting more papers. |
| Under 55% | Well short | Substantial re-study needed across several topics. |
On the passing score. CFA Institute does not publish a minimum passing score — it is set after each administration by a standard-setting process, and reported estimates have generally sat below 70%. These bands deliberately use 70% as a conservative working target: clear it consistently and you are not depending on where the line happens to fall.
F to flag, keep moving, and press G for the navigator to
come back. The score page reports how many flagged items you actually got wrong — usually far
fewer than the anxiety suggested.